
Woke up this morning excited to catch the HBO Real Sports episode featuring David Millar and the Garmin-Chipotle cycling team. It's not often our beloved sport crosses into the mainstream media, so I was excited beyond words to watch. (I even postponed my training ride to the afternoon, so I could watch the show in the morning).
The piece was good. David's story is truely a remarkable one. Here is a guy who stood on the moral high ground on doping early in his career. He was out to prove you could win without doping. After a few years under the intense pressure of his team, sponsors, and managers, he cracked and doped. In an instant, David pushed his values aside and fell into the dark side of our sport. He was caught, jailed, suspended, fell into drinking, and gave up on cycling. Like any redemption story, he made his way back to the sport he loved, and is now a champion in the world of ending doping in our sport. Doing so with the flair and cool that only David can.
John Frankel and Bryant Gumbell completed the piece with their commentary at the end. I should have turned the TV off at this point. My faith in the media left me to believe they would leave the audience without something positive about the direction cycling is going. Some nice kudos for those teams who are leading the charge for a dope free sport. And then they drop the bomb...
Bryant Gumball "I can't believe folks in the cycling world still consider Lance to be a hero" He went on to compare Lance to Barry Bonds and Roger Clemons. The debate over whether or not Lance doped can be argued from here to eternity. So what substance does this accusation make to the story? I guess a sports writer is only happy if they have a villain. Who would make a better villain than the man who won 7 Tour's and is a hero in the minds of thousands of cancer survivors? It's this kind of gutter ball media that makes me ill.
Someone pass me a pain reliever. The Tour can't start soon enough.